Sample Sizes Based on Exact Unconditional Tests for Phase II Clinical Trials with Historical Controls

by: Myron N Chang, Jonathan J Shuster, James L Kepner

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Vol. 14, No. 1. (2004), pp. 189-200.

View FullText article

Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

Find related articles from these CiteULike users

wbrady5

Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

binomial, clinical_trial, historical_control, phase_ii

摘要

Investigated in the setting of phase II clinical trials is the two-sample binomial problem of testing H0 : pe = pc H1 : pe > pc, where pe and pc are the unknown target population response rates for the experimental and control groups, respectively, using the usual Z-statistic with pooled variance estimator. The cornerstones that make this paper unique are as follows. First, the emphasis is on determining the sample size given that the control group information has already been collected (historical control). Second, exact unconditional inference, rather than an asymptotic method, is utilized. Sample size tables, contrasting the exact and asymptotic methods, are provided. Although asymptotic results were usually fairly close to the exact results, some important differences were observed.

@article{citeulike:2520689, abstract = {Investigated in the setting of phase II clinical trials is the two-sample binomial problem of testing H0\ :\ pe\ =\ pc H1\ :\ pe\ \>\ pc, where pe and pc are the unknown target population response rates for the experimental and control groups, respectively, using the usual Z-statistic with pooled variance estimator. The cornerstones that make this paper unique are as follows. First, the emphasis is on determining the sample size given that the control group information has already been collected (historical control). Second, exact unconditional inference, rather than an asymptotic method, is utilized. Sample size tables, contrasting the exact and asymptotic methods, are provided. Although asymptotic results were usually fairly close to the exact results, some important differences were observed.}, author = {Chang, Myron N. and Shuster, Jonathan J. and Kepner, James L. }, citeulike-article-id = {2520689}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/BIP-120028514}, journal = {Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics}, keywords = {binomial, clinical\_trial, historical\_control, phase\_ii}, number = {1}, pages = {189--200}, posted-at = {2008-03-12 14:25:42}, priority = {0}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}, title = {Sample Sizes Based on Exact Unconditional Tests for Phase II Clinical Trials with Historical Controls}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/BIP-120028514}, volume = {14}, year = {2004} }

RIS record

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2520689 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2520689 N2 - Investigated in the setting of phase II clinical trials is the two-sample binomial problem of testing H0 : pe = pc H1 : pe > pc, where pe and pc are the unknown target population response rates for the experimental and control groups, respectively, using the usual Z-statistic with pooled variance estimator. The cornerstones that make this paper unique are as follows. First, the emphasis is on determining the sample size given that the control group information has already been collected (historical control). Second, exact unconditional inference, rather than an asymptotic method, is utilized. Sample size tables, contrasting the exact and asymptotic methods, are provided. Although asymptotic results were usually fairly close to the exact results, some important differences were observed. IS - 1 JF - Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics EP - 200 TI - Sample Sizes Based on Exact Unconditional Tests for Phase II Clinical Trials with Historical Controls PB - Taylor & Francis VL - 14 SP - 189 KW - binomial KW - clinical_trial KW - historical_control KW - phase_ii AU - Chang, Myron AU - Shuster, Jonathan AU - Kepner, James PY - 2004/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/BIP-120028514 ER -

RIS BibTeX