注册 | 登录 | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials

by: Mithat Gonen
Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 26, No. 2. (April 2005), pp. 131-140.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X 摘要

At the end of the dose escalation stage of Phase I trials, investigators occasionally enroll additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to further explore the tolerability of the regimen. There is no explicit statistical justification for doing so; neither are there any guidelines regarding the use of toxicity information from this additional cohort with respect to the modification of MTD if necessary. This article addresses both of these issues using a Bayesian approach to model the probability of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at the MTD. This approach takes the sequential nature of the Phase I design into account and provides predictive and posterior distributions through which various probabilities of interest can be calculated. The results suggest that MTD is usually not well defined with a cohort of 3-6 patients in the traditional dose escalation schema. Therefore, enrolling additional patients at the MTD is recommended. Also demonstrated are different ways to use the posterior density, after the additional cohort is enrolled, to decide whether the MTD is unacceptably toxic.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.