注册 | 登录 | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

wandall's statistics [35 articles]

当前文献位于 wandall's 文献库 标签分类为 statistics. You can also see everyone's statistics.
  • Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism.
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, Vol. 286, No. 4. (April 2004)
    by TH Holmes
    posted to bias endocrinology error metabolism statistics by wandall on 2007-12-21 15:55:04 as **
  • Risk Assessment and Risk Management: an Uneasy Divorce
    (1991), pp. 99-114.
    edited by DG Mayo, RD Hollander
  • Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management (Environmental Ethics and Science Policy Series)
    (21 January 1994)
    by Mayo
    posted to risk_assessment risk_management statistics by wandall on 2007-11-12 17:28:10 as **
  • Nothing Personal: On Statistical Discrimination*
    Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 0, No. 0. (0000), pp. ???-???.
    posted to statistics by wandall on 2007-09-26 16:02:09 as **
  • Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866)
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 3. (September 2007), pp. 618-626.
    by Avital Pilpel
    posted to statistics by wandall on 2007-09-26 13:28:20 as **
  • Pure Pedantry : Men and Women Can Have Different Average Numbers of Sexual Partners
    posted to sample statistics by wandall on 2007-08-17 13:56:58 as **
  • Nondetects, Detection Limits, and the Probability of Detection
    Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 86, No. 414. (1991), pp. 266-277.
    by Diane Lambert, Bruce Peterson, Irma Terpenning
    posted to detection_level risk_assessment statistics threshold by wandall on 2007-07-09 13:23:00 as **
  • BIOSTATISTICAL METHODOLOGY IN CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES
    Drug Information Journal, Vol. 32 (1998), pp. 401-421.
    by William R Fairweather, Amit Bhattacharyya, Peter P Ceuppens, Guenter Heimann, Ludwig A Hothorn, Ralph L Kodell, Karl K Lin, Harry Mager, Brian JSLOB Middleton, Keith A Soper, Nigel Stallard, John Ventre, Jane Wright
    posted to animal_studies carcinogen experimental_design statistics by wandall on 2007-07-09 12:51:17 as **
  • We should be designing better experiments.
    Vet Anaesth Analg, Vol. 30, No. 2. (April 2003), pp. 59-61.
    by MF Festing
  • The need for statistical analysis of rodent micronucleus test data. Comment on the paper by Ashby and Tinwell.
    Mutat Res, Vol. 329, No. 2. (July 1995), pp. 221-224.
    by MF Festing, DP Lovell
    posted to animal_studies expert_judgment statistics by wandall on 2007-07-09 12:43:27 as **
  • Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals.
    ILAR J, Vol. 43, No. 4. (2002), pp. 244-258.
    by MF Festing, DG Altman
  • Sudden Infant Death or Murder? A Royal Confusion About Probabilities
    Br J Philos Sci, Vol. 58, No. 2. (1 June 2007), pp. 299-329.
    by Neven Sesardic
  • notes Indiscriminate data aggregations in meta-analysis. A cause for concern among policy makers and social scientists.
    Eval Rev, Vol. 26, No. 5. (October 2002), pp. 520-544.
    posted to metaanalysis statistics by wandall on 2007-04-13 16:19:44 as **
  • notes Randomized experiments as the bronze standard
    Journal of Experimental Criminology, Vol. 1, No. 4. (24 December 2005), pp. 417-433.
    by Richard A Berk
  • Statistical Assumptions as Empirical Commitments
    (2001)
    by Richard Berk, David A Freedman
    posted to statistics by wandall on 2007-04-13 16:10:40 as **
  • Wofur sprechen die Daten?
    Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Vol. 35, No. 1., 13.
    by Thomas Bartelborth
  • Dicing with Death: Chance, Risk and Health
    (24 November 2003)
    by Stephen Senn
    posted to statistics by wandall on 2007-03-31 14:34:04 as **
  • Of Nulls and Norms
    by Peter Godfrey-Smith
    posted to statistics by wandall on 2007-03-15 23:03:22 as **
  • R. A. Fisher: a faith fit for eugenics
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 1. (March 2007), pp. 110-135.
    by James Moore
    posted to darwinism statistics by wandall on 2007-03-13 10:48:40 as **
  • Bayeswatch: an overview of Bayesian statistics
    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 8, No. 2. (2002), pp. 277-286.
    by Peter C Austin, Lawrence J Brunner, Hux
    posted to bayesian statistics by wandall on 2007-03-10 11:19:52 as ** along with 3 people Borelli xinian axelon
  • Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 8. (1 August 2005), e124.
    by John P Ioannidis
  • Reckoning with Risk
    (24 April 2003)
    by Gerd Gigerenzer
    posted to mammography risk statistics by wandall on 2007-02-18 08:37:24 as **
  • Some Public Policy Problems with the Science of Carcinogen Risk Assessment
    by Carl F Cranor
  • Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa
    Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 54, No. 285. (1959), pp. 30-34.
    by Theodore D Sterling
    posted to statistics publication judgement bias by wandall on 2007-02-07 11:56:37 as read
  • Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses).
    BMJ, Vol. 315, No. 7109. (13 September 1997), pp. 672-675.
  • How to read a paper. Statistics for the non-statistician. II: "Significant" relations and their pitfalls.
    BMJ, Vol. 315, No. 7105. (16 August 1997), pp. 422-425.
  • How to read a paper. Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests.
    BMJ, Vol. 315, No. 7104. (9 August 1997), pp. 364-366.
  • Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight.
    BMJ, Vol. 327, No. 7417. (27 September 2003), pp. 741-744.
    posted to risk risk_assessment statistics by wandall on 2006-12-11 14:39:24 as ** along with 1 person rsr2001
  • Influence of design characteristics on the outcome of retrospective cohort studies.
    Br J Ind Med, Vol. 45, No. 9. (September 1988), pp. 624-629.
    by GM Swaen, JM Meijers
    posted to cohort_studies epidemiology statistics study_design toxicology by wandall on 2006-11-10 12:36:32 as read
  • The comparative power of the discriminant methods used in toxicological pathology.
    Toxicol Pathol, Vol. 33, No. 4. (2005), pp. 490-494.
    by T Holland
    posted to blinding histopathology scientific_method statistics toxicology by wandall on 2006-11-09 20:19:24 as read
  • Increasing Public Participation in Controversies Involving Hazards: The Value of Metastatistical Rules
    Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 10, No. 4. (1985), pp. 55-68.
    by Deborah G Mayo
    posted to risk_assessment statistics value by wandall on 2006-11-09 19:58:20 as ** along with 1 person misc8g
  • Toward a More Objective Understanding of the Evidence of Carcinogenic Risk
    by Deborah G Mayo
    posted to carcinogen evidence risk statistics by wandall on 2006-11-09 19:54:00 as ***
  • Statistical Issues in Toxicology
    Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 95, No. 449. (2000), pp. 304-308.
    by Louise M Ryan
    posted to statistics toxicology by wandall on 2006-11-09 19:52:09 as read
  • Poor-Quality Medical Research: What Can Journals Do?,
    JAMA June 5, 2002, Altman 287 (21): 2765
    posted to quality statistics by wandall on 2006-11-09 13:41:12 as **
  • Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends
    Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 23. (2000), pp. 3275-3289.
    by Douglas G Altman
    posted to metaanalysis statistics by wandall on 2006-11-09 13:35:06 as ***
  • ◇温馨提示◇本页的引用地址为: http://www.citeulike.org/user/wandall/tag/statistics

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.