注册 | 登录 | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

marcius's docking [32 articles]

当前文献位于 marcius's 文献库 标签分类为 docking. You can also see everyone's docking.
  • Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening.
    J Comput Chem, Vol. 26, No. 1. (15 January 2005), pp. 11-22.
  • Structural bioinformatic approaches to the discovery of new antimycobacterial drugs.
    Curr Pharm Des, Vol. 10, No. 26. (2004), pp. 3195-3211.
  • Virtual screening in structure-based drug discovery.
    Mini Rev Med Chem, Vol. 4, No. 7. (September 2004), pp. 779-791.
    by X Barril, RE Hubbard, SD Morley
  • Virtual screening in lead discovery and optimization.
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel, Vol. 7, No. 4. (July 2004), pp. 396-403.
    by AN Jain
  • Integration of NMR and high-throughput screening.
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen, Vol. 5, No. 8. (December 2002), pp. 613-621.
    by PJ Hajduk, DJ Burns
    posted to docking drug hts nmr by marcius on 2006-10-21 14:21:21 as ** along with 2 groups BioinfoCIPF SGU-CIPF
  • High-throughput nuclear magnetic resonance-based screening.
    J Med Chem, Vol. 42, No. 13. (1 July 1999), pp. 2315-2317.
    by PJ Hajduk, T Gerfin, JM Boehlen, M Häberli, D Marek, SW Fesik
    posted to docking drug nmr by marcius on 2006-10-21 14:20:40 as ** along with 2 groups BioinfoCIPF SGU-CIPF
  • NMR fragment screening: Advantages and applications.
    IDrugs, Vol. 9, No. 2. (February 2006), pp. 110-113.
    by M Schade
    posted to docking drug nmr by marcius on 2006-10-21 14:20:14 as ** along with 2 groups BioinfoCIPF SGU-CIPF
  • Library design for fragment based screening.
    Curr Top Med Chem, Vol. 5, No. 8. (2005), pp. 751-762.
    posted to docking drug nmr by marcius on 2006-10-21 14:19:42 as ** along with 2 groups BioinfoCIPF SGU-CIPF
  • Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications.
    Nat Rev Drug Discov, Vol. 3, No. 11. (November 2004), pp. 935-949.
    by DB Kitchen, H Decornez, JR Furr, J Bajorath
  • A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Proteins, Vol. 56, No. 2. (1 August 2004), pp. 235-249.
    by E Perola, WP Walters, PS Charifson
  • NMR-based screening methods for lead discovery.
    EXS, No. 93. (2003), pp. 183-202.
    posted to docking drug nmr by marcius on 2006-10-21 14:15:02 as ** along with 2 groups BioinfoCIPF SGU-CIPF
  • Current status of virtual screening as analysed by target class.
    Med Chem, Vol. 2, No. 1. (January 2006), pp. 89-112.
    by MJ Stoermer
  • Recent development and application of virtual screening in drug discovery: an overview.
    Curr Pharm Des, Vol. 10, No. 9. (2004), pp. 1011-1033.
    by T Hou, X Xu
  • A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des, Vol. 16, No. 3. (March 2002), pp. 151-166.
    by RD Taylor, PJ Jewsbury, JW Essex
  • Modelling and simulation: a computational perspective in anticancer drug discovery.
    Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents, Vol. 4, No. 5. (September 2004), pp. 401-403.
    by F Gago
  • Docking: successes and challenges.
    Curr Pharm Des, Vol. 11, No. 3. (2005), pp. 323-333.
    by V Mohan, AC Gibbs, MD Cummings, EP Jaeger, RL DesJarlais
  • New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening.
    Curr Pharm Des, Vol. 11, No. 9. (2005), pp. 1189-1202.
    by FL Stahura, J Bajorath
  • A comparative docking study and the design of potentially selective MMP inhibitors.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des, Vol. 15, No. 10. (October 2001), pp. 873-881.
  • kinDOCK: a tool for comparative docking of protein kinase ligands.
    Nucleic Acids Res, Vol. 34, No. Web Server issue. (1 July 2006)
  • Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
    J Med Chem, Vol. 47, No. 3. (29 January 2004), pp. 558-565.
  • RNA as a drug target: chemical, modelling, and evolutionary tools.
    Curr Opin Biotechnol, Vol. 9, No. 1. (February 1998), pp. 66-73.
    posted to disease docking drug review rna by marcius on 2006-08-01 11:46:07 as ** along with 2 groups BioinfoCIPF SGU-CIPF
  • Targeting RNA with small molecules.
    Curr Med Chem, Vol. 7, No. 1. (January 2000), pp. 73-98.
    by WD Wilson, K Li
    posted to disease docking drug review rna by marcius on 2006-08-01 11:44:58 as ** along with 2 groups BioinfoCIPF SGU-CIPF
  • Thermodynamics of RNARNA binding
    Bioinformatics, Vol. 22, No. 10. (15 May 2006), pp. 1177-1182.
    by Ulrike Muckstein, Hakim Tafer, Jorg Hackermuller, Stephan H Bernhart, Peter F Stadler, Ivo L Hofacker
  • Interaction of viruses with the mammalian RNA interference pathway.
    Virology, Vol. 344, No. 1. (5 January 2006), pp. 151-157.
    by S Schütz, P Sarnow
  • RNA molecules stimulate prion protein conversion.
    Nature, Vol. 425, No. 6959. (16 October 2003), pp. 717-720.
  • New screening tools for lead compound identification
    Nat Chem Biol, Vol. 1, No. 3. (2005), pp. 125-125.
    by Tomi K Sawyer
  • Chemical space and biology
    Nature, Vol. 432, No. 7019. (16 December 2004), pp. 824-828.
    by Christopher M Dobson
  • Exploring biology with small organic molecules
    Nature, Vol. 432, No. 7019. (16 December 2004), pp. 846-854.
    by Brent R Stockwell
  • Thermodynamics of RNA-RNA Binding.
    Bioinformatics (29 January 2006)
    by Ulrike Mückstein, Hakim Tafer, Jörg Hackermüller, Stephan H H Bernhart, Peter F F Stadler, Ivo L L Hofacker
  • Lead discovery using molecular docking.
    Curr Opin Chem Biol, Vol. 6, No. 4. (August 2002), pp. 439-446.
    by BK Shoichet, SL McGovern, B Wei, JJ Irwin
  • Virtual screening of chemical libraries
    Nature, Vol. 432, No. 7019. (16 December 2004), pp. 862-865.
    by Brian K Shoichet
  • Geometry-based flexible and symmetric protein docking.
    Proteins, Vol. 60, No. 2. (1 August 2005), pp. 224-231.
  • ◇温馨提示◇本页的引用地址为: http://www.citeulike.org/user/marcius/tag/docking

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.