注册 | 登录 | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Unusual usage of AGG and TTG codons in humans and their viruses.

by: RM Kliman, CA Bernal
Gene, Vol. 352 (6 June 2005), pp. 92-99.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X 摘要

Prior analysis on human protein-coding DNA sequences has identified local base composition as the primary predictor of synonymous codon usage. However, in many organisms, codon usage is influenced by natural selection, particularly for efficient expression of functional gene products. Because viruses are expected to evolve codon usage in the context of their host's molecular machinery, their genomes provide another window into the forces that guide their host's molecular evolution. Factor analysis was performed on codon usage of 16,654 genes annotated in Build 34 of the human genome, and the primary factor was correlated strongly with local base composition. However, two codons, AGG and TTG, rose in frequency as all other C- and G-ending codons decreased in frequency. These two codons were the only C- or G-ending codons with usages that negatively correlated with gene expression. Variation among viruses in codon usage also strongly reflects variation in base composition and, again, AGG and TTG decrease in frequency as all other C- and G-ending codons increase in frequency. It appears that usages of these two codons can not be explained by local compositional biases, implying a more direct role of natural selection on codon usage in humans.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.