注册 | 登录 | FAQ      [?] 

所有的文献@标签 peer_review [39 articles]

当前文献的标签分类为: peer_review.
  • Engaging Expert Peers in the Development of Risk Assessments
    Risk Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 6. (December 2007), pp. 1609-1621.
    by Patterson, Jacqueline, Bette Meek, , Strawson, E Joan, Liteplo, G Robert
    posted to expertise expert_judgment experts peer_review risk_assessment by wandall on 2007-12-19 12:41:45 as **
  • Peer review and the relevance of science
    Futures, Vol. 39, No. 7. (September 2007), pp. 827-845.
    by Alister Scott
    posted to peer_review policy scientific_expertise by wandall on 2007-05-09 10:34:22 as ** along with 1 person ronzinante
  • Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
    Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. V1, No. 2. (1 June 1977), pp. 161-175.
    by Michael J Mahoney
    posted to bias peer_review publication by wandall on 2006-11-09 20:02:47 as read along with 1 person MariaChiaraP
  • The discourteous reviewer.
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, Vol. 21, No. 1. (January 2007), pp. 2-4.
    by A Leviton
    posted to peer_review publication by wandall on 2007-06-19 15:36:20 as **
  • Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis
    (23 Feb 2007)
    by Lutz Bornmann, Ruediger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel
    posted to peer_review by rzach on 2008-04-14 05:40:31 as **
  • Open Access Scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise
    (26 Mar 2007)
    by Stevan Harnad
    posted to open_access peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-05-28 17:54:20 as ** along with 4 people hpiwowar scholze gioia amarois
  • Peer Review
    Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 25, No. 4. (2003), pp. 359-361.
    by P Hernon, C Schwartz
    posted to peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-07-16 17:31:13 as ** along with 4 people and 4 groups PatrickD momo54 gioia JSicot Philosophy_of_Information Blog_and_Wiki_Research Wikipedia ecoo-ce
  • The Power and the Perils of Peer Review
    Rhetoric Review, Vol. 13, No. 2. (1995), pp. 245-248.
    by Carol Berkenkotter
    posted to authorship peer_review review science by MariaChiaraP on 2007-06-07 13:46:57 as read along with 3 people lblanken soph41 gioia
  • Research Specialization and the Refereeing Process
    Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. 69, No. 2. (1995), pp. 147-153.
    by Charles A Schwartz
    posted to peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-07-16 17:33:45 as ** along with 1 person gioia
  • Peer review and journal models
    (31 Aug 2006)
    by Paolo Dall'aglio
    posted to open_access open_science peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-06-02 15:36:16 as ** along with 3 people ansobol proportional gioia
  • Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing
    PNAS, Vol. 101, No. 51. (21 December 2004), pp. 17599-17604.
    by Lee C Giles, Isaac G Councill
    posted to peer_review trust by MariaChiaraP on 2007-07-16 17:26:03 as ** along with 1 person gioia
  • Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data
    Information Processing & Management, Vol. 41, No. 6. (December 2005), pp. 1419-1440.
    by Johan Bollen, Herbert Van de Sompel, Joan A Smith, Rick Luce
    posted to impact_factor peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-07-16 17:06:31 as ** along with 21 people and 5 groups Enro magnusenger ldfu alisonruth timbrody carolh12 Bonaria lbjay dartar hpiwowar bibliothecaire ckeene carolegiansily bschmidt pool scholze gioia amarois mjubb JSicot entropy DocSci Librarians OpenArchive SITCRC Urfist_PacaC
  • Finalization: Cool Radicalism versus the Republic of Science [Finalization in Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 77 (Wolf Schafër)]
    4S Review, Vol. 2, No. 4. (1984), pp. 14-20.
    by Sal Restivo
    posted to peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-06-01 17:47:19 as ** along with 1 person gioia
  • A Perspective on Scientific Peer Review for Informing Regulatory Decisions: Making Sure Peer Review Makes a Difference
    Risk Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 1. (February 2006), pp. 17-19.
    by Dan Greenbaum
    posted to peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-06-01 18:00:50 as ** along with 1 person gioia
  • Scientific Misconduct and Editorial and Peer Review Processes
    The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 65, No. 3. (1994), pp. 298-309.
    by Mary F Fox
    posted to peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-06-01 17:51:33 as ** along with 1 person gioia
  • notes Enemies of Promise: Publishing, Perishing, and the Eclipse of Scholarship
    (24 May 2004)
    by Lindsay Waters
    posted to peer_review publication by MariaChiaraP on 2007-06-02 12:54:53 as ** along with 1 person evegray
  • Journal Status
    (9 Jan 2006)
    by Johan Bollen, Marko A Rodriguez, Herbert Van de Sompel
    posted to journals peer_review by MariaChiaraP on 2007-07-16 17:54:04 as ** along with 3 people pdlug kevina gioia
  • Reviewing Peer Review
    Science, Vol. 321, No. 5885. (4 July 2008), 15.
    by Bruce Alberts, Brooks Hanson, Katrina L Kelner
    posted to peer_review scholarly_communication by libtech7 on 2008-07-13 17:38:58 as ** along with 10 people and 2 groups applebyb Borelli rrbarb sen_cheng emmahe johnsonw kaniko annyork jago HugoMarcelo Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse STS
  • Peer Review: The Many Sides of Virtue
    Educational Researcher, Vol. 14, No. 1. (1985), pp. 12-13.
    by Lee S Shulman
    posted to peer_review by gioia on 2006-12-14 17:23:33 as **
  • New NIE Peer Review Procedures
    Educational Researcher, Vol. 14, No. 1. (1985), pp. 5-11.
    by Manuel J Justiz, Hunter N Moorman
    posted to peer_review by gioia on 2007-05-30 21:38:33 as **
  • Teaching Evaluation by Peers
    Teaching Sociology, Vol. 23, No. 1. (1995), pp. 61-63.
    by Teresa A Sullivan
    posted to peer_review by gioia on 2006-12-14 17:20:10 as ***
  • Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates
    American Sociological Review, Vol. 53, No. 1. (1988), pp. 139-151.
    by Lowell L Hargens
    posted to peer_review by gioia on 2007-07-05 15:08:29 as **
  • Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community
    Inf. Process. Manage., Vol. 41, No. 6. (December 2005), pp. 1462-1480.
    by Xiaoming Liu, Johan Bollen, Michael L Nelson, Herbert Van de Sompel
    posted to peer_review van_de_sompel by gioia on 2007-07-05 15:05:14 as ** along with 3 people cmmorel scholze Simplicity
  • Commentary: Peer Review Is Alive and Well in the United States
    Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 10, No. 3. (1985), pp. 82-86.
    by Arie Rip
    posted to peer_review by gioia on 2006-12-14 17:19:42 as **
  • Using peer review as a vehicle for communication skill development and active learning
    J. Comput. Small Coll., Vol. 21, No. 2. (December 2005), pp. 148-155.
    by Karen Anewalt
    posted to peer_review by gioia on 2006-12-14 16:17:52 as ** along with 1 person and 1 group jryall CHISEL
  • Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
    AJR. American journal of roentgenology, Vol. 189, No. 3. (September 2007), pp. 523-526.
    by RB Ruchman, J Jaeger, EF Wiggins, S Seinfeld, V Thakral, S Bolla, S Wallach
    posted to emergency error peer_review quality_assurance teams by errata on 2008-08-18 17:07:04 as **
  • Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.
    J Am Coll Radiol, Vol. 1, No. 12. (December 2004), pp. 984-987.
    by MJ Halsted
    posted to cqi diagnostic_errors peer_review by errata on 2008-03-10 00:35:11 as **
  • Radiology Resident Interpretations of On-call Imaging Studies The Incidence of Major Discrepancies.
    Academic radiology, Vol. 15, No. 9. (September 2008), pp. 1198-1204.
    by VF Cooper, LA Goodhartz, AA Nemcek, RK Ryu
    posted to error peer_review scoring trauma by errata on 2008-08-18 17:06:10 as **
  • Diagnostic radiology peer review: a method inclusive of all interpreters of radiographic examinations regardless of specialty.
    Radiology, Vol. 180, No. 2. (August 1991), pp. 557-561.
    by KD Hopper, GF Rosetti, RB Edmiston, JE Madewell, LM Beam, JR Landis, KL Miller, JA Ricci, MA McCauslin
    posted to interpretation peer_review by errata on 2008-08-18 15:26:31 as **
  • Evaluation of competence in the interpretation of chest radiographs.
    Academic radiology, Vol. 8, No. 4. (April 2001), pp. 315-321.
    by PN Cascade, EA Kazerooni, BH Gross, LE Quint, TM Silver, RA Bowerman, PG Pernicano, A Gebremariam
    posted to audit peer_review scoring by errata on 2008-08-18 15:34:44 as **
  • Revolutionizing peer review?
    Nat Neurosci, Vol. 8, No. 4. (April 2005), pp. 397-397.
    posted to peer_review scientific_communication web by dartar on 2007-10-04 13:45:04 as read
  • Prestige is factored into journal ratings
    Nature, Vol. 439, No. 7078. (15 February 2006), pp. 770-771.
    by Philip Ball
    posted to citations metrics peer_review scientometrics by dartar on 2008-01-08 16:51:26 as *** along with 3 people sarahepierce scholze marcio
  • Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact: Research Articles
    J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., Vol. 57, No. 8. (June 2006), pp. 1060-1072.
    by Tim Brody, Stevan Harnad, Leslie Carr
    posted to bibliometrics peer_review by dartar on 2007-11-15 14:54:01 as *** along with 1 person katja
  • notes The Impact Factor Game
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 6. (1 June 2006)
    posted to authority bibliometrics peer_review web_epistemology by dartar on 2006-06-19 17:14:57 as read along with 10 people casutton jprenaud dullhunk dbogartoit MariaChiaraP OriginalLurch JSicot Carlton zuckerzeit Carol_Perryman
  • Show me the data
    J. Cell Biol., Vol. 179, No. 6. (17 December 2007), pp. 1091-1092.
    by Mike Rossner, Heather Van Epps, Emma Hill
    posted to authority citations impact_factor peer_review by dartar on 2008-07-22 22:44:58 as ** along with 9 people bigbossman brembs neils amarois JSicot Gaetan heliopais espace etkimura
  • Peer review and fraud
    Nature, Vol. 444, No. 7122. (21 December 2006), pp. 971-972.
    posted to peer_review by dartar on 2007-10-04 16:32:49 as read
  • Can Peer Review Be Better Focused
    Science & Technology Libraries, Vol. 22, No. 3-4. (14 January 2004), pp. 5-17.
    by Paul Ginsparg
    posted to arxiv peer_review by dartar on 2007-10-04 17:32:53 as read
  • Journal impact measures in bibliometric research
    (2002), pp. 171-193.
    by W Glanzel
    posted to bibliometrics metrics peer_review by dartar on 2007-10-04 14:50:08 as *** along with 1 person Carol_Perryman
  • Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 8. (1 August 2005), e124.
    by John P Ioannidis
    posted to bandwagon_effect bias effect_size peer_review by biomcgary on 2008-01-18 16:11:06 as ** along with 6 people and 1 group hpiwowar wandall ggorjan devender willie_gt gvdh FlowCytometry
    • ◇温馨提示◇本页的引用地址为： http://www.citeulike.org/tag/peer_review

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.